What the church took from you · Sola Exemplum
All writings
8 min read

What the church took from you.

An empty wooden church pew with a single open book resting on it.

You probably walked away in your twenties or thirties. You probably told yourself, at the time, that you were leaving behind superstition. What you were actually leaving behind was a carefully managed redirection of the one question you kept noticing.

The question was: why does any of this have to be like this? Why is the world arranged to produce so much pain for so many people for so little apparent reason? Why does the person who was supposed to keep you safe not always keep you safe? Why does the body you were given wear out in ways you did not consent to? Why does any of the effort people put into being kind ever matter, when so much of the time it doesn't?

You asked that question at some point, in some form. Everyone does. It is the question the adult human animal is built to ask, eventually. And the church, whatever church, had an answer ready for you.

The answer that was ready.

The answer was usually some combination of: there is a plan you cannot see, you are fallen and therefore the pain is partially your own doing, the suffering you are witnessing is balanced by a reward after death, and in the meantime you should trust and keep showing up. The specifics varied. The structural shape did not.

You accepted the answer or you did not. If you accepted it, you built a life around it and it held you for a while, and at some point — sometimes gradually, sometimes in a single afternoon — the answer stopped holding. If you did not accept it, you left earlier. Either way you ended up on the same street, which is the one you are standing on now.

Here is the part that is rarely said out loud: the answer was bad, but the question was the right question. When you left the church, you did not only leave behind an answer you had stopped believing. You also left behind the space in which the question was considered legitimate to ask. In the rest of the culture, the question is not asked. You are told, if you ask it, that you are being morbid, or that you should see someone, or that you should go to yoga.

What was actually lost.

What was lost, when you left, was not god. It was the permission to ask the question out loud. The institution had claimed the territory of the question, and when you rejected the institution, the question went with it. Nothing in secular culture adequately replaces the space the church held for that specific question.

Therapy gestures at the question but does not answer it; it mostly helps you function around it. Philosophy can answer it, at a very high level, but requires training most people do not have. Meditation turns the question into an experience and asks you to sit with the experience. Politics turns the question into an economic grievance and asks you to organize. None of these is quite the same thing as being in a room with other people who are all trying to answer, with a straight face, why any of this has to be the way it is.

What Sola Exemplum is proposing.

The argument of Sola Exemplum is that the original teaching — what Jesus was actually pointing at before the institution built its apparatus around him — did in fact have an answer to that question. The answer was not the answer the institution ended up settling on. The institutional answer was a transaction: Jesus dies, you are forgiven, you go to heaven if you believe the right things. That transaction is not what the teacher was teaching.

What he was teaching was something more like: the pain is part of the architecture, the architecture has a purpose, and the purpose is not punishment. It is formation. You are here to become the kind of consciousness that can see through the architecture and walk out of it, and the pressure is not a mistake — the pressure is what makes the becoming possible.

You do not have to take that on faith. The main book of Sola Exemplum argues it from the texts, from history, and from the philosophical and scientific evidence available to us. What is worth saying here, shorter than the argument, is: the question you were asking was the right question. It still is. Whatever you replaced it with when you left the church was probably not big enough to hold what you were asking. It is worth asking again, with what you know now, and without the institutional packaging that made it impossible to answer honestly the first time.

You did not walk away from the truth. You walked away from a container that had been built to hide it.